By G5global on Tuesday, March 28th, 2023 in dine-app-overzicht beoordelingen. No Comments
Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and you will Individual Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The area of attachment in peoples mating. Breakdown of Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Sites paradox reviewed. Diary regarding Social Affairs, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A social tech one reduces personal wedding and you will mental better-getting? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Yards., & Fields, J. Yards. (2001). Count, timing, and you will time of marriage ceremonies and you can divorces. Most recent Populace Accounts, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Impact most useful in the performing bad: Public evaluations within this close relationship. Journal out-of Identity and you can Societal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A good., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Record away from Character and you can Societal Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you can attractive solutions: The newest developed psychology out-of dating maintenance. Development and Human Choices, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Age. (1981). Sequential analysis of disagreement and you will agreement when you look at the upset and nondistressed relationship couples. Journal of Consulting and you will Systematic Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A good., Green, A good. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Relationship development on line: What is the huge interest? Journal out-of Personal Facts, 58(1), 9–30.
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. Grams., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The key benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and design away from pleasure when you look at the close dating. Journal out of Personality and you can Personal Psychology, 70(1), 79–98.
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-analysis aim for the intimate matchmaking: A type of around the globe enhancement and you may certain verification. Into the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Insights ents in the study of pair telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College Drive.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-therapist thread through the contact off connection idea. Psychotherapy: Theory, Look, Routine, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The brand new societal keeping track of program: Enhanced awareness to help you personal cues just like the a transformative a reaction to social difference. During the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The latest personal outcast: Ostracism, personal exclusion, rejection, and you may bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Mindset Press.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Worldwide and specific relational activities regarding the experience of societal relations. Log out of Personality and you may Public Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you may information seeking to for the personal relationship. Character and Societal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., https://datingmentor.org/nl/dine-app-overzicht & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and specific connection representations when you look at the adulthood: Will there be a relationship?. Diary Out of Social And private Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Good. (2001)mitment and relationship fix mechanisms. For the J. Harvey & A beneficial. Wenzel (Eds.), Close personal relationships: Repairs and you will enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An excellent. D. (2000). Projection physically impression one of partners because the a function of the latest resemblance inside their shared experiences. Identity And Personal Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience out-of extrinsic advantages towards the preference and you will loving. Journal off Identification and you will Social Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.
ACN: 613 134 375 ABN: 58 613 134 375 Privacy Policy | Code of Conduct
Leave a Reply